Saturday, July 5, 2008

In Denial About Climate Denial

Poor William Reville, occasional science writer for the Irish Times. He wrote recently that the attitudes of some environmentalists reminded him of religious fundamentalists. Nearly as bad as the Pope accusing some Muslims of having a propensity to use violence. Needless to say Reville's comments provoked a furious response (though not quite as extreme as the Pope's) - not unlike those of, er, some religious fundamentalists (of a Muslim or Christian orientation, we're an equal opportunity offender on this blog ;-).

Dr Reville isn't anti-green or - worse - a climate change denialist (the new Satanists in the Green panoply of eco-heaven and hell). He just argues for common sense:
The green movement draws attention to important issues that everyone must take seriously and it has played an important role in galvanising action from mainstream politics. But many green interpretations and solutions are largely intuitive and some have little scientific justification. Take the notion of the idyllic state in which simple pre-modern societies lived/live in nature. This is simply a myth, as anthropology confirms. Inter-tribal warfare, intra-tribal murder and violence were and are commonplace. Also, what is idyllic about an 80 per cent infant mortality rate and complete vulnerability to disease?
But common sense upsets some folk it seems. Still, I have immense faith in the common sense of the Irish people. In the recent Eurobarometer of EU citizens' main concerns, only 4% of Irish people thought that protecting the environment was one of the two most important issues facing Ireland at present (see page 76: the EU27 average is 5%, by the way). The environment is on the list: just nowhere near the top.

This must be terribly frustrating for those of a green fundamentalist bent. Especially when their colleagues are spending €12.5 million of taxpayers' money trying to persuade the taxpayer to Change their behaviour. And there's the problem: people think others should change - not them. The Change campaign's own research shows that the majority of Irish people disapprove of a range of potential initiatives such as raising taxes on coal, gas and heating oil (see slide 23). But they're happy to see people in SUVs pay more. I'm guessing most of those approving don't drive SUVs ...

This is not to say that keeping people fully informed about the environmental consequences of their private choices isn't worthwhile. Of course it is: a better informed decision is usually a better decision. For example, research shows that consumers are more likely to change their behaviour in response to energy and recycling labels on products than, say, organic and fair trade labels.

But for a climate agnostic like me (and Dr Reville), I take heart from the refusal of the Irish people to be browbeaten into eco-guilt and shame, despite the earnest proselytizing of the Green faithful.

2 comments:

  1. I'm not a green fundamentalist by any stretch (love my car) but there is a simple fact that oil is a limited resource and our lives are going to have to change significantly as the effects of this limit become more apparent. I also think that it is less traumatic to instigate change in advance of the deadline rather that having it forced upon us in a rush at the end. The eco stuff will sort itself out ultimately. Oh and there are WAY too many people in the world.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This green religion is a dictatorship that is forcing down the throats of the world one child policies, forceful birth control programs in third world countries and ignores the drug companies who test aids drugs on children. In Chicago and NY.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8245349/

    Our entire lives are going to be dictated to us through this, nothing you do will be good enough, where is the outrage over the depleted uranium that has been smeared all over Iraq, or the White Phosphorus weapons being tested in Israel and Iraq?

    Where is the outrage over the Nuclear waste that has been used as fertilizer on tobacco in the united states for years [polonium 210]
    http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B0DEEDB1E31F935A25752C1A961948260

    Unless and until the "greenies" start addressing real issues that are current and lethal to survival they are simply touting a breath tax, every living thing on this earth is a CARBON BASED LIFE FORM my pet rock has a footprint. These people are frauds, they are using ancient strong arm crap.

    The stones to use "denial" comparing it to holocust denial is making them more suspect. The eugenics crazy, neo-malthusians are the ones who did the holocust started this green crap, not to mention they own the corporations that belch out toxic waste into the atmosphere.

    And if there are too many people on the earth what do you think people further up the food chain are willing to do to thin the herd? Dont you think they will cut the fat here instead of the bone overseas? Would anybody dare being a vegan when we are eating genetically modified food?

    If you really want to be green, get a small 5 acre farm and grow your own food, grow your own, the absolute worst environmental crime scene is a city.

    Pax

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...