Well the attached chart is for all those SME managers in that position: it shows the value of Irish shares - including all financial stocks - on 21st February 2007. The peak of the peak of the Celtic Tiger boom as far as stock prices were concerned. We will never see the likes of it again (at least not for another generation). Just compare the chart to the latest ISEQ indices to see how far things have fallen. The managers of Irish financial institutions have so far presided over the destruction of some 93% of shareholder wealth in just 21 months. Your turn for teeth sucking and tut-tutting.
What is slowly dawning on people - to gauge from an increasing number of conversations with business folk - is that their nest eggs have been destroyed, and with it a change to get off the treadmill any time in the next decade or two. The destruction of shareholder wealth in Ireland will reverberate for decades - long after angry 70-somethings have got their medical cards back. Just how bad things will be for Irish people in their forties and fifties is seen in a recent US study (pdf) - where things have not been as bad as in Ireland:
This paper extrapolates from data from the 2004 Survey of Consumer Finance to project household wealth, by wealth quintile, for the cohort that will be between the ages of 45-54 in 2009 under three alternative scenarios. The first scenario assumes that real house prices fall no further than their level as of March 2008. The second scenario assumes that real house prices fall an additional 10 percent as a 2009 average. The third scenario assumes that real house prices fall an additional 20 percent for a 2009 average. (Real house prices are currently falling at the rate of approximately 1.5 percent a month.)My emphasis added. Remember - we've seen even greater collapses in house prices and share prices in Ireland - so the numbers are worse for any Irish family expecting to live on a defined contribution pension. The way I see it, middle class, middle aged folk generally don't do marches and street protests (they're too busy working) but they do vote and something tells me they'll be making their feelings felt next time they're anywhere near a ballot box.
The projections show that the vast majority of families in these age cohorts will have little or no wealth by 2009 in any of these scenarios. In the first scenario, families in the 45 to 54 age cohort in 2009, who were in the middle grouping of the wealth distribution in 2004, will have on average just $113,600 of wealth in 2009, 26.2 percent less than families in this age group in 2004. In the second scenario, families in the middle quintile will have $97,600 in wealth, 36.6 percent less than families in 2004. In the third scenario, families will have $81,500, 47.0 percent less than families in the middle quintile for this age cohort in 2004.