The Minister for Finance is, as Sir Humphrey might say, being 'very brave'. He has gambled on achieving most of his budget ambitions through tax increases, with rather less from expenditure cuts. Given his experiences with VAT (an increase in the standard rate in December followed by a calamitous fall in revenues the following months), he is being very brave indeed. Perhaps that is why he has opted to secure 73% of his tax increases through additional taxes on incomes (income levy + health levy + PRSI increases) rather than spending.Nevertheless, his bravery is foolhardy. The families that will be hurt the most by this budget - working couples in their thirties and forties with dependent children, mortgages and insurance policies - will be confronted with a nasty reality: it isn't worth their while financially for both spouses to keep on working for sharply reduced net household incomes. So they won't.
We are embarking on a real world test of the Laffer Curve hypothesis: that above a certain level of taxation, employees withdraw their labour causing a collapse in government revenues from income taxes. Nor is the Laffer Curve some throwback idea from the 1980s: recent experiments in behavioural economics show the existence of a behavioural Laffer curve.
One consequence of the more flexible and fluid, predominantly private sector labour market that we now have in Ireland is just that: individuals and households are flexible - they make adjustments to the new circumstances that face them. Including decisions about whether to work, and for how long. I'm guessing Irish working couples will look at their paychecks this month and next and act accordingly.
Ireland is unique among OECD countries in responding to the global economic crisis through a policy of tax increases. Indeed, we appear to have a government that is living in a world more familiar to Sir Humphrey than to that in which most of us live. They are gambling the nation's future on the hope of a shortlived recession that will see us growing again in twenty months time. If they are wrong, and the Minister for Finance has to go to the IMF next autumn for the money to pay teachers' and nurses' salaries, then the decisions made today will seem not so much brave as reckless.
I suspect Laffer will have the last laugh.
Interesting perspective and I am sure that for many working couples the costs of running an extra car, reduced childcare assistance and generally higher taxation may indeed make one of the jobs more marginal. Though if one spouse exits the market, woudn't their marginal salary prove very attractive for example to a single person on the unemployment register thereby negating the Laffer effect? Indeed the tax take to the Government might increase if this person does not require any childcare/child benefit transfers.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAdd to this the effective scrapping of the childcare supplement and taxing and means testing of children's allowance and you are really making the two income scenario less viable. Many couples would rather look after their own children and the economic case to do otherwise has to be convincing. This budget will be enough to push us over the Laffer hump and down the other side for sure.
ReplyDelete視訊聊天,080聊天室,080苗栗人聊天室,6k聊天室,視訊聊天室,成人聊天室,中部人聊天室,免費視訊,視訊交友,視訊美女,視訊做愛,正妹牆,美女交友,玩美女人,美女,美女寫真,美女遊戲,hi5,hilive,hi5 tv,a383,微風論壇,微風,伊莉,伊莉討論區,伊莉論壇,sogo論壇,台灣論壇,plus論壇,plus,痴漢論壇,維克斯論壇,情色論壇,性愛,性感影片,校園正妹牆,正妹,AV,AV女優,SEX,走光,a片,a片免費看,A漫,h漫,成人漫畫,免費A片,色情網站,色情遊戲,情色文學,麗的色遊戲,色情,色情影片,同志色教館,色色網,色遊戲,自拍,本土自拍,kk俱樂部,後宮電影院,後宮電影,85cc免費影城,85cc免費影片,免費影片,免費小遊戲,免費遊戲,小遊戲,遊戲,好玩遊戲,好玩遊戲區,A片,情趣用品,遊戲區,史萊姆好玩遊戲,史萊姆,遊戲基地,線上遊戲,色情遊戲,遊戲口袋
ReplyDelete